logo

Rust crates reviews

Cryptographically verifiable, distributed dependency reviews

crate: rand

https://lib.rs/crates/rand/

Rust links:

Rust-lang.org

lib.rs

crates.io

docs.rs

Add the last reviewed version to Cargo.toml / [dependencies]:

rand = "0.8.4"

Please, use mobile in landscape.

Filter reviews clicking on the numbers in the summary.

Full column names in tooltip hints: rating Negative, rating Neutral, rating Positive, rating Strong, thoroughness, understanding, reviews count.

Neg
Neu
Pos
Str
tho
und
rev
crate
10
1
1
12
0.8.4
1
1
0.8.3
2
2
0.8.2
1
1
0.8.1
2
2
0.7.3
1
1
0.7.2
1
1
0.7.0
1
0.6.5
2
1
2
0.6.1
1
1
crate version
rating
date
reviewer
thoroughness, understanding
rand 0.8.4
positive
2021-11-29
bestia-dev
none, none

rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.

Published to crates.io by: dhardy

rand 0.8.3
positive
2021-05-07
mgeisler
low, low

This is the standard crate for random number generation. I use it in
my own projects.

The code uses unsafe in a few places for performance reasons such as
SIMD support. It is hard for me to say if this is safe, but I have
had no problems with it myself.

rand 0.8.3
positive
2021-11-29
bestia-dev
none, none

rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.

Published to crates.io by: dhardy

rand 0.8.2
positive
2021-11-29
bestia-dev
none, none

rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.

Published to crates.io by: dhardy

rand 0.8.1
positive
2021-05-07
mgeisler
low, low

This is the standard crate for random number generation. I use it in
my own projects.

The code uses unsafe in a few places for performance reasons such as
SIMD support. It is hard for me to say if this is safe, but I have
had no problems with it myself.

rand 0.8.1
positive
2021-11-29
bestia-dev
none, none

rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.

Published to crates.io by: dhardy

rand 0.7.3
positive
2021-11-29
bestia-dev
none, none

rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.

Published to crates.io by: dhardy

rand 0.7.2
positive
2021-11-29
bestia-dev
none, none

rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.

Published to crates.io by: dhardy

rand 0.7.0
2019-09-05
dpc
advisories:
https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/pull/149
medium
major
rand 0.6.5
positive
2021-11-29
bestia-dev
none, none

rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.

Published to crates.io by: dhardy

rand 0.6.5
positive
2019-07-31
KonradBorowski
low, medium
rand 0.6.1
strong
2018-12-20
dpc
none, low

I failed to review the whole thing. I looked at unsafes and when through ~10 random files. LGTM, but considering how important this crate it, my understanding of it is insufficient.

© bestia.dev 2023, MIT License, Version: 2023.608.1636

Open source repository for this web app: https://github.com/bestia-dev/cargo_crev_web/