Cryptographically verifiable, distributed dependency reviews
Add the last reviewed version to Cargo.toml / [dependencies]:
rand_hc = "0.3.1"Please, use mobile in landscape.
Filter reviews clicking on the numbers in the summary.
Full column names in tooltip hints: rating Negative, rating Neutral, rating Positive, rating Strong, thoroughness, understanding, reviews count.
Version 0.3.1 adjusts links in Cargo.toml and disables a few Clippy lints.
There are no material changes to the crate, so my previous review stands.
Version 0.3.1 adjusts links in Cargo.toml and disables a few Clippy lints.
There are no material changes to the crate, so my previous review stands.
No unsafe code, has tests and references to the original
implementation.
rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.
Published to crates.io by: dhardy
This is an implementation of an HC-128 RNG.
The crate has no unsafe, and doesn't seem to do anything obviously fishy.
I didn't compare the algorithm to the relevant paper though, so I don't vouch
this is a faithful implementation.
This is an implementation of an HC-128 RNG.
The crate has no unsafe, and doesn't seem to do anything obviously fishy.
I didn't compare the algorithm to the relevant paper though, so I don't vouch
this is a faithful implementation.
rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.
Published to crates.io by: dhardy
rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.
Published to crates.io by: dhardy
© bestia.dev 2023, MIT License, Version: 2023.608.1636
Open source repository for this web app: https://github.com/bestia-dev/cargo_crev_web/
rand is de facto the basic crate for random
I didn't review the source code.
It has 235 contributors. I hope they can spot strangeness.
Published to crates.io by: dhardy