Cryptographically verifiable, distributed dependency reviews
Add the last reviewed version to Cargo.toml / [dependencies]:
require_unsafe_in_body = "0.2.0"
Please, use mobile in landscape.
Filter reviews clicking on the numbers in the summary.
Full column names in tooltip hints: rating Negative, rating Neutral, rating Positive, rating Strong, thoroughness, understanding, reviews count.
0.2.0: More refactoring surrounding generics.
0.2.0-alpha: Significant refactoring, adding support for generics. LGTM?
0.1.2: Seems solid, although my syn-fu is weak, limiting my ability to review this.
File | Rating | Notes |
---|---|---|
src/docs/require_unsafe_in_bodies.md | +1 | |
src/docs/require_unsafe_in_body.md | +1 | |
src/utils/macros.rs | +1 | |
src/utils/mod.rs | +1 | |
src/lib.rs | +1 | understanding: low - I'm barely following along |
src/tests.rs | +1 | |
tests/ui/body_on_method_2.rs | +1 | |
tests/ui/body_on_method_2.stderr | +1 | |
tests/ui/body_on_method.rs | +1 | |
tests/ui/body_on_method.stderr | +1 | |
tests/ui/readme.rs | +1 | |
tests/ui/readme.stderr | +1 | |
tests/impl_method_2.rs | +1 | The cfgs on unit-tests look the wrong way around? |
tests/impl_method.rs | +1 | The cfgs on unit-tests look the wrong way around? |
tests/trait_default_method.rs | +1 | The cfgs on unit-tests look the wrong way around? |
tests/ui.rs | +1 | The cfgs on unit-tests look the wrong way around? |
.cargo_vcs_info.json | +1 | |
.cargo-ok | +1 | |
.gitignore | +1 | |
Cargo.toml | +1 | MIT |
Cargo.toml.orig | +1 | MIT |
LICENSE | +1 | MIT |
Makefile | +1 | Unixy |
README.md | +1 |
Other | Rating | Notes |
---|---|---|
unsafe | +1 | Wrangles unsafe but doesn't actually use it itself |
fs | +1 | None |
io | +1 | Modifies codegen through syn |
docs | +1 | |
tests | +1 |
let Struct { ref member, ref mut member2, .. } = to_destructure;
Seems solid, although my syn-fu is weak, limiting my ability to review this.
File | Rating | Notes |
---|---|---|
src/docs/require_unsafe_in_bodies.md | +1 | |
src/docs/require_unsafe_in_body.md | +1 | |
src/utils/macros.rs | +1 | |
src/utils/mod.rs | +1 | |
src/lib.rs | +1 | understanding: low - I'm barely following along |
src/tests.rs | +1 | |
tests/ui/body_on_method_2.rs | +1 | |
tests/ui/body_on_method_2.stderr | +1 | |
tests/ui/body_on_method.rs | +1 | |
tests/ui/body_on_method.stderr | +1 | |
tests/ui/readme.rs | +1 | |
tests/ui/readme.stderr | +1 | |
tests/impl_method_2.rs | +1 | The cfgs on unit-tests look the wrong way around? |
tests/impl_method.rs | +1 | The cfgs on unit-tests look the wrong way around? |
tests/trait_default_method.rs | +1 | The cfgs on unit-tests look the wrong way around? |
tests/ui.rs | +1 | The cfgs on unit-tests look the wrong way around? |
.cargo_vcs_info.json | +1 | |
.cargo-ok | +1 | |
.gitignore | +1 | |
Cargo.toml | +1 | MIT |
Cargo.toml.orig | +1 | MIT |
LICENSE | +1 | MIT |
Makefile | +1 | Unixy |
README.md | +1 |
Other | Rating | Notes |
---|---|---|
unsafe | +1 | Wrangles unsafe but doesn't actually use it itself |
fs | +1 | None |
io | +1 | Modifies codegen through syn |
docs | +1 | |
tests | +1 |
let Struct { ref member, ref mut member2, .. } = to_destructure;
© bestia.dev 2023, MIT License, Version: 2023.608.1636
Open source repository for this web app: https://github.com/bestia-dev/cargo_crev_web/
0.2.0-alpha: Significant refactoring, adding support for generics. LGTM?
0.1.2: Seems solid, although my syn-fu is weak, limiting my ability to review this.
Detail
TIL