Performs as advertised, on obvious flaws IMO

Simple crate for converting to and from bech32 format. Code is clean and to the best of my
knowledge secure.

I've been working as a maintainer of this crate for the last year, to the best of my knowledge it has no security flaws

I have been working six months now on crates in the github.com/rust-bitcoin organisation, to the
best of my knowledge this crate is secure.

I have been working six months now on crates in the github.com/rust-bitcoin organisation, to the
best of my knowledge this crate is secure.

I have been working six months now on crates in the github.com/rust-bitcoin organisation, to the
best of my knowledge this crate is secure.

This crate is a very thin layer on top of code from Bitcoin Core.

I am the current maintainer (but not the original author), this crate is sound to the best of my knowledge

I spent about half an hour looking over this small crate, LGTM.

To the best of my knowledge this crate is secure, maintained, and well written.

"I am not a cryptographer but to the best of my knowledge this crate is sound. (I've been working on maintaining this crate for the last 12 months.)"

I attest that this version of the library is secure to the best of my knowledge, I am not a cryptographer.

I have worked on maintaining this crate for the last 12 months, I attest that this version of the library is secure to the best of my knowledge

This version is secure to the best of my knowledge

I have been working six months now on crates in the github.com/rust-bitcoin organisation, to the
best of my knowledge this crate is secure.

I attest that this version of the library is secure to the best of my knowledge. I am only attesting to this crate (the FFI layer) not the underlying C code (libsecp256k1), I am not a cryptographer.